THE LEAPERS EXPLAINABLE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM™
Can you trace the resultback to the behaviour that produced it?
An assessment score is not enough on its own.
A trustworthy system should be able to explain which competency was assessed, which behaviour was observed, which exercise it emerged in, and how the result was interpreted.
The Leapers Explainable Assessment System™ brings these layers of the assessment process together in one traceable architecture.
THE TRACEABILITY CHAIN
From decision need to development action
- 01Decision Context
- 02Competency
- 03Behavioral Indicator
- 04Exercise
- 05Evidence
- 06Scoring / Analysis
- 07Human Review
- 08Explainable Output
- 09Development Action
THREE LEVELS OF EXPLAINABILITY
Score-Level Explainability
Why did this score exist?
- Which evidence contributed
- Which competency area
- Which exercise context
Behavior-Level Explainability
Which behaviour supported this result?
- Focused on observable evidence, rather than generic judgement
Action-Level Explainability
What should this finding become?
- Development priority
- Leadership development
- Feedback
- Targeted learning
- Future reassessment
- Decision-support discussion
Human-in-the-loop is not “AI writes a score, human approves it”
“AI writes a score, a human approves it.”
In some digital assessments, a live assessor may not be present during participant interaction
- Methodology is designed by humans
- Assessment rules are prestructured
- Final human review remains
- Defining assessment purpose
- Selecting competencies
- Defining behavioral indicators
- Exercise design
- BARS/BOS design
- Methodology calibration
- Contextual interpretation
- Final quality review
- Development meaning
Explainability vs. automation
Automation asks
How quickly can we produce a result?
Explainability asks
Can we show why the result exists?
The Leapers prioritizes both efficiency and traceability.
SYSTEM LAYERS
The layers this system integrates
METHODOLOGY IN PRACTICE
Where this system has been applied
FAQ